THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MONEY (BY MORGAN HOUSEL)
Have you heard the story about Ronald Read, the janitor that had 8 million dollars in savings when he died in 2014? Yes, you heard that right. Janitor. $8 million. And he didn´t win the lottery or inherit the money either. He just saved consistently throughout his life, while letting the wonders of compounding do their thing. The moral is that your behavior with money is oftentimes more important than how intelligent you are. Even if you don´t have a diploma from Harvard or work on Wall Street, you can become rich by just behaving soundly. As Morgan Housel puts it: “Financial success is not hard science. It’s a soft skill, where how you behave is more important than what you know.
Takeaway number 1: Pay the price let's say you want a new, nice,
watch. You go to the store to check out the offerings. You are really after
something that will impress your friends and the lovely lady you are dating. You
now have a choice: either pay for the watch or steal it and run because you have
done your cardio, right? My guess is that you would choose option number one- no
matter your physical capacity. You would take out your card and swipe that
thing; do the right thing. The point is that you know that having a new watch
comes with a price, a fee. And it's just the same with investing; it comes with
a price too. there are some reoccurring takeaways for high returns; one of them
being a somewhat concentrated portfolio with Peter Lynch perhaps being the
exception. The concentrated portfolio brings with it a characteristic to your
performance; it will be volatile. This is the price, the fee, for having high
returns in the stock market over the long term. If you don't have the stomach to
stay the course when your net worth decreases by, say, 20% during a single
week, as two of your major holdings report quarterly earnings below what
analysts expected, don't aim to maximize your returns; because the higher the
returns, the higher this fee typically is. Let´s say you already 10 years ago
could visualize Netflix’s bright future. You invested a large portion of your net
worth in the stock. Well, then you would be quite a rich person today! However,
could you afford to pay the price for this journey? Netflix has, during this
period, had many major downturns. Would you have sat still in that boat during
2011 when Netflix lost tons of customers, and the stock price fell 80% from its
peak during the ensuing months? Your portfolio returns would look terrible. What
would you tell your spouse and your kids? Could you stomach facing them knowing
that you might just have endangered their future? Would you still think that
being almost all-in Netflix is a good idea? This is of course an extreme
example, but even if you have something less extreme than an all-in Netflix
approach to investing, you’ll have to pay the price of volatility nonetheless. Let’s
say that you bought an S&P 500 index fund in 1980. You’d still have to face
about 13 years combined when your investment portfolio was down 20% from its
high. And about 8 months when it was down 50%. That’s tough! Stock-market
investing is a great thing, that enables wealth creation like few other
options. But don´t try to fool yourself – it doesn´t come for free. All investors
will experience volatility, and you have to look at it as the price you pay for
a brighter future.
Takeaway number 2: Never Enough It's a very interesting
phenomenon that you can hand somebody a $2 million bonus, and they’re fine until
they find out that the person next to them got a 2-million-1, and then they’re
sick for the next year. Capitalism is great at doing two things: generating
wealth and generating envy. The urge to surpass your neighbors, peers, and
friends, can help energize your hard work and strive to really "make
it". And of course, being motivated into becoming more productive and doing
meaningful work is a good thing, but social comparison can also cause us to feel
like we’re never enough. Let’s look at some statistics. To belong to the top 1%
highest income earners in the US, you’d have to earn somewhere around $500,000 a
year. That’s what a highly specialized doctor, let’s call him Bill, earns, and by
almost any standard, Bill would be considered rich. He can afford to drive nice
cars, go on long vacations to exotic countries, perhaps hire someone to do work
that he thinks is tedious, etc. Bill has been feeling about himself and what he
has achieved financially in his life. Well, that was until he bought a vacation
home in the Hamptons and realized that he had Stan as his neighbor. Stan belongs
to the top 1% of the 1%. He is a CEO of a quite large public company and earns
a staggering $10 million per year. Now, you’d hope that at least Stan would be
satisfied with his financial achievements, but nope! This guy was a childhood
friend of Michael Jordan, and this all-time great basketball player is someone
who belongs to the 1% of the 1% of the 1%. And well, compared to Michael’s
fortune of about $2b, Stan’s yearly salary of $10m suddenly seems like peanuts. Does
it end here? Well no, it doesn’t. Because Michael occasionally attends parties
with celebrities where a guy named Jeff Bezos shows up. Bezos is in the top 1%
of the 1% of the 1% of the 1%and he increased his net worth by about $75b in
2020, now sitting at something like $200b. There’s always a bigger fish. The type
of envy which has emerged from comparisons of this kind has caused a lot of
people to do foolish things throughout history. Some have leveraged their
portfolios to the teeth to move up to a higher pyramid, just to lose it
all and then commit suicide. Some have acted on insider information and lost
both their personal reputation and then later their freedom when they’ve gone to
jail. Many have forsaken their families and then had their partners leave them
or cheat on them (or both) as a result. You need to, at some point, accept that enough is enough. We will not trade
something that we have and need for something that we don’t have and don’t
need, even if we’d kind of like to have it.
Takeaway number 3: Crazy is in the
eye of the beholder at first glance, it seems like a lot of people do crazy
things with their money. Some spend it in ridiculous amounts on ridiculous
items, and others hide it under their mattresses. But remember that people come from different backgrounds with different childhoods, different parents, different life experiences, and different educations. All this adds up
to different perspectives and values. What seems crazy to you might make total
sense to me. Morgan uses the example of lottery tickets in the book: the US's lowest-income households spend more than 400 dollars per year on the
lottery. This is 4 times more than the average in the highest income group. Combine
this with the fact that more than a third of Americans can not come up with 400
dollars for an emergency. Do these people spend their emergency buffer on
lottery tickets? Seems crazy, doesn´t it? But again; we don´t have the same
perspective as individuals. Try to see it from their perspective; they live
paycheck to paycheck, with little room to save money, they often lack education
and thus a nice career trajectory they can´t afford a nice vacation or a new
car, and they can´t put their children through college without a mountain of
debt. Buying a lottery ticket is their way of buying into the dream that many of
us already live. That is why they buy more lottery tickets than we do. Not so
crazy after all perhaps? So, how does this make you a better investor? For one
thing, by acknowledging that we are different, we become less tempted to copy an investment portfolio or strategy which doesn’t suit our own goals. For
example, our own risk profile might be higher than a billionaire, as our own
focus is more on the “getting rich part”, and not so much on “staying rich”. Copying
the billionaire’s portfolio might be suboptimal for your goals. Acknowledging
differences can also help us to say no more easily to investments that are
outside our own circle of competence. Take GameStop for example. As I am not a
trader, I didn’t participate in this drama at all. It is simply not my card to
play. Understanding different peoples’ perspectives, or at least that there are
different lenses to see the world, will help you make better sense of
our society and lead you on the path that is yours.
Takeaway number 4: Peek-a-booth does the Great Depression, World War II, the financial crises, and Covid-19 all
have in common? They were all events that shaped our society, they had huge
impacts on the financial markets and were pretty much impossible to
foresee. Nassim Taleb, who is one of my favorite authors, would refer to this event as Black Swans. The definition of a Black Swan is that: Nothing that has
happened before can convincingly point to even the possibility of the event. Human
nature fools us into believing that we should have been able to know it would
happen all along. Imagine it is Black Monday 1987. How would you have reacted to
the market losing almost one-fourth of its value in one day? Would you have
been one of the individuals that shouted: “SELL! SELL!” or would you have been
able to weather the storm, perhaps putting in additional chips which you’ve kept
on the sidelines? Here’s an interesting fact: If you invested in the S&P 500
index 20 years ago, but you missed out on the 4 best performing stock market
days, you’d have a 164% return instead of 291%. That’s quite a big difference. The
moral of this takeaway is that it is more useful to prepare yourself, both
mentally and financially, for a disaster that you cannot foresee than to hope that you’re able to react before everyone else. Stop listening to macro
projections, the things that will cause big fear among the investment community
in the future are the things that are unlikely to be foreseen anyways.
Takeaway
number 5: The seduction of pessimism I were to give you a bunch of reasons why the market will crash later this year, mentioning the gigantic US
governmental debt, that stimulus checks may lead to the return of inflation, and
perhaps something about new strains of Covid-19; you would most likely be
intrigued, and perhaps end up with quite a negative view of where in the market
cycle that we are at the moment. Was I instead to give you examples of why
things probably will continue to get better, by showing how life expectancy is
rising, how sustainable energy is getting cheaper how computing power is
exploding, you would most likely just shrug your shoulders and not think twice
about it. We all know that the pessimistic person sounds so very intelligent, and
the optimist sounds naïve in comparison; why is that? Daniel Kahneman, the author
of Thinking Fast and Slow, says asymmetry toward loss and listening to
pessimists is an evolutionary trait; “When directly compared or weighed against
each other, losses loom larger than gains. Organisms that treat threats as more
urgent than opportunities have a better chance to survive and reproduce.” We tend
to listen to pessimists more carefully, not only for evolutionary reasons but
also because progress happens much slower than setbacks do. Progress rarely
happens overnight, but setbacks often do. Because tragedies and setbacks
happen during much shorter periods, it's much easier to create an intriguing
and persuading story around it, and thus it receives more attention. To create an
optimistic story about the future, we must look at longer time horizons. This
often becomes vaguer and less dramatic. Knowing that you will perhaps be
more fascinated by a pessimist, and less so by an optimist, can perhaps help you
become less asymmetric towards it in the future. The world is better than you
think, as Sweden’s Hans Rosling would have said. So. you are not going to get
rich in the stock market without paying the price of volatility- Envy is the
worst of the seven deadly sins. Never risk what you have and need for what you
don’t have and don’t need.- Different perspectives cause different courses of
action to be reasonable or rational- Instead of trying to foresee disasters
prepare yourself mentally and financially so that you can survive them; and - Be
careful when taking investment advice. Understand that pessimism appeals more to
your survival instincts than optimism does.

Comments
Post a Comment