The Quest For World Dominance!

 At the heart of this research is a simple but powerful motivation: The desire to understand who really runs the world. Like many others, I have often wondered who the people are that hold the most influence over global decisions, shaping politics, economics, culture, and even the everyday lives of ordinary citizens. This study is driven by that curiosity, but it also aims to move past speculation and look at the issue in a structured, evidence-based way. By examining powerful individuals, institutions, and networks, the research seeks to uncover how influence is built, how it is exercised, and how it flows across borders. 

1) Lets First Identify these powerful people and groups: ( In todays time and age)

Key Positions Occupated by CFR ( Council on Foreign Relations) Members (2000-Present)

1. The White House & Executive Branch President:

Joe Biden (CFR Member): His administration is filled with CFR members.

George W. Bush (Not a member, but...) His administration was heavily staffed with CFR members, demonstrating the group's bipartisan reach.

Vice President:

Dick Cheney (CFR Member)

Kamala Harris (Not a member, but her key staff and advisors are)

Secretary of State (ALL of them): This is the most consistent pipeline.

Marco Rubio was never listed as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) ( All CFR members are not publicized) . He has, however, participated in CFR events and engaged with the institution. He also served on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for over a decade. 

Antony Blinken (Current, CFR Member)

Mike Pompeo (Trump Admin, CFR Member)

Rex Tillerson (Trump Admin, CFR Member)

John Kerry (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Hillary Clinton (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Condoleezza Rice (G.W. Bush Admin, CFR Member)

Colin Powell (G.W. Bush Admin, CFR Member)

Secretary of the Treasury:

Scott Bessent is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Janet Yellen (Current, CFR Member)

Steven Mnuchin (Trump Admin, Not a member, a rare exception)

Jack Lew (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Timothy Geithner (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Henry Paulson (G.W. Bush Admin, CFR Member)

Secretary of Defense:

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (CFR Member) (Now is is the secretary of war)

• Written works: In his 2020 book American Crusade, Hegseth wrote, "We don't want to fight, but, like our fellow Christians one thousand years ago, we must". He has also stated that people who benefit from Western civilization should "thank a Crusader". He describes a modern-day "American Crusade" against what he considers internal and external enemies, such as Islamism and leftist ideology.
• Tattoos and symbolism: Hegseth has a tattoo of a Jerusalem cross on his chest and the Latin phrase Deus Vult ("God wills it") on his bicep. Deus Vult was a battle cry of Christian crusaders during the 11th century. 

Lloyd Austin (Current, CFR Member)

Mark Esper (Trump Admin, CFR Member)

James Mattis (Trump Admin, CFR Member)

Ashton Carter (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Chuck Hagel (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Leon Panetta (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Robert Gates (G.W. Bush/Obama Admin, CFR Member)

National Security Advisor:

Jake Sullivan (Current, CFR Member)

Robert O'Brien (Trump Admin, Not a member)

John Bolton (Trump Admin, CFR Member)

H.R. McMaster (Trump Admin, CFR Member)

Susan Rice (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Tom Donilon (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

James L. Jones (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Stephen Hadley (G.W. Bush Admin, CFR Member)

Condoleezza Rice (G.W. Bush Admin, CFR Member)

The acting National Security Advisor has been Marco Rubio since May 1, 2025

2. Financial & Economic Control Chair of the Federal Reserve:

Jerome Powell (Current, CFR Member) 16th chair of the Federal Reserve since 2018

Janet Yellen (Previous, CFR Member)

Ben Bernanke (Previous, CFR Member) - Key figure during the 2008 crisis.

World Bank President: (Traditionally nominated by the U.S. President)

Ajay Banga (Current, CFR Member)

David Malpass (Trump Admin, CFR Member)

Jim Yong Kim (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Robert Zoellick (G.W. Bush Admin, CFR Member)

Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF):

Kristalina Georgieva (Current, Not a member, but works intimately with the CFR network)

Christine Lagarde (Previous, CFR Member)

3. Intelligence and National Security Director of National Intelligence (DNI):

Avril Haines (Current, CFR Member)

Dan Coats (Trump Admin, CFR Member)

Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA):

William Burns (Current, CFR Member)

Gina Haspel (Trump Admin, CFR Member)

Mike Pompeo (Trump Admin, CFR Member)

John Brennan (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Leon Panetta (Obama Admin, CFR Member)

Michael Hayden (G.W. Bush Admin, CFR Member)

*) Other governmental roles : 

Elaine Chao: Secretary of Transportation (2017-2021)

Role at CFR: Chao, who is also the wife of Senator Mitch McConnell, has been a longtime member of the CFR.

Wilbur Ross: Secretary of Commerce (2017-2021)

Mike Pompeo: Director of the CIA (2017-2018), then Secretary of State (2018-2021)

4. Influential Non-Government Roles Media Leadership: CFR members hold top positions at major news organizations, shaping public discourse on foreign policy.

CNN: Fareed Zakaria (host, CFR Member)

The New York Times: Numerous columnists and editors.

The Washington Post: Editorial board members and journalists.

Bloomberg: Key editors and analysts.

Think Tank Leadership: Heads of other major think tanks (Brookings Institution, Carnegie Endowment, etc.) are often CFR members, creating an interlocking directorate of policy influence.

University Leadership: Presidents and deans of top universities (especially Ivy League schools) are frequently CFR members, influencing the next generation of elites.

Corporate Boardrooms: CEOs and senior executives of multinational corporations, particularly in finance and tech, are well-represented in the CFR. This connects economic and foreign policy directly.

How the "Recommendation" System Actually Works It is not a formal directive. The process is more organic and institutional:

The Talent Pool: The CFR's membership list is the talent pool. If you are looking for someone with experience in European security, Asian economics, or nuclear non-proliferation, you will find dozens of experts with impeccable credentials in the CFR directory.

Vetting and Credentialing: Having "CFR Member" on your resume is a powerful signal. It means you have been vetted by the existing establishment, you understand the prevailing foreign policy consensus, and you have access to a powerful network.

The "Phone Call": When an administration is being formed, the heads of presidential transition teams (who are often longtime CFR members themselves) call upon their vast networks to suggest names for key positions. These suggestions overwhelmingly come from within the established pool of experts—the CFR.

Bipartisan Continuity: As the list above shows, whether a Republican or Democrat wins the White House, the personnel drawn from the CFR ensure a remarkable degree of continuity in the fundamental direction of U.S. foreign policy. The rhetoric may change, but the core strategic playbook often remains the same.

In conclusion, from 2000 to today, the key levers of American foreign policy, finance, and intelligence have been overwhelmingly controlled by members of the Council on Foreign Relations. This demonstrates the successful culmination of the project started by Cecil Rhodes's Round Table groups: the creation of a permanent, trans-administration, and bipartisan foreign policy establishment that guides the ship of state regardless of who is the temporary captain.

2) Historically Powerful People and their role :

Chronological Timeline of Key Figures

1. St. Augustine of Hippo (354 – 430)

Role: Theological Foundation

Action: His writings and theology, particularly his emphasis on God's divine grace as the sole source of human salvation (vs. good works), provided the foundational bedrock for Martin Luther's own theological rebellion over a thousand years later.

2. John Wycliffe (c. 1320s – 1384)

Role: The Morning Star of the Reformation

Action: An English theologian and philosopher who argued that the Bible, not the Pope, was the ultimate Christian authority. He inspired the first complete translation of the Bible into English, empowering people to read scripture for themselves.

3. Jan Hus (c. 1369 – 1415)

Role: Proto-Reformer

Action: A Bohemian priest and philosopher inspired by Wycliffe's writings. He fiercely criticized the corruption and worldliness of the Catholic Church, preaching that ultimate authority lay in scripture. His execution for heresy sparked the Hussite Wars.

4. Martin Luther (1483 – 1546)

Role: The Instigator

Action: A German monk and theologian who nailed his 95 Theses to the Wittenberg church door in 1517, sparking the Protestant Reformation. He established the core doctrines of Sola Fide (faith alone) and Sola Scriptura (scripture alone), breaking the Pope's authority and empowering individuals to interpret the Bible.

5. Erasmus of Rotterdam (1466 – 1536)

Role: The Scholar

Action: A Dutch humanist scholar who used new scholarly tools to produce a Greek New Testament (1516). This critical text allowed reformers like Luther to translate the Bible into common languages such as German from original sources, not the Latin Vulgate. This gave access to Bible for all people. 

6. Johann von Staupitz (c. 1460 – 1524)

Role: Luther's Mentor

Action: Vicar-General of the Augustinian Order and Luther's superior and spiritual guide. He counseled Luther through his spiritual crises and directed him toward the study of theology and the concept of grace.

7. René Descartes (1596 – 1650)

Role: Father of Modern Philosophy

Action: A French philosopher who attempted to base knowledge on human reason alone ("I think, therefore I am"). His method elevated human reason as the judge of all truth, including religious truth, inadvertently making faith dependent on rational justification.

8. Isaac Newton (1643 – 1727)

Role: The Prophet-Scientist

Action: The paramount scientist of his age (laws of motion, gravity) who was also a radical heretic, alchemist, and obsessive student of biblical prophecy. As President of the Royal Society (1703-1727), he merged science with prophecy, arguing that Jews must return to Israel to fulfill end-times prophecy and that Britain had a divine role in this plan.

9. John Theophilus Desaguliers (1683 – 1744)

Role: Newton's Bridge to Freemasonry

Action: Newton's protégé, experimental assistant, and a leading figure in early Freemasonry. He was the driving force behind the Premier Grand Lodge of England (1717) and co-author of its Constitution, applying Newton's rational order to the fraternity's structure.

10. David Hume (1711 – 1776)

Role: The Skeptic

Action: A Scottish Enlightenment philosopher who argued that all human knowledge comes from sensory experience. He challenged the possibility of knowing anything about God through reason or experience, pushing philosophy toward radical skepticism and creating a crisis for faith.

11. Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804)

Role: The Compromiser

Action: A German philosopher who responded to Hume's skepticism. He argued that God, freedom, and immortality are not things we can know but are necessary "postulates of practical reason" we must believe in to act morally. This reduced the Bible to a book of moral teaching, not divine revelation.

12. John Nelson Darby (1800 – 1882)

Role: The Systematizer

Action: An Anglo-Irish preacher and a founding figure of the Plymouth Brethren. He developed Dispensationalism, a theological framework that divided history into distinct periods and taught that God has two separate peoples (Israel and the Church) and two separate plans . This theology created the modern imperative for Christians to support a Jewish return to Israel.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNRXyZSyYmZ/?igsh=MWgyNXY3eWx0dHlyaw==

13. Cyrus Ingerson Scofield (1843 – 1921)

Role: The Popularizer

Action: An American theologian and minister. His Scofield Reference Bible (1909) embedded Dispensationalist theology directly into the biblical text through notes and cross-references. It became the primary tool for spreading these beliefs to millions of Protestants worldwide.

https://x.com/WarsawErik/status/1976275215920529723?t=EGFgpf9sQPAyJ_eOmnzNEQ&s=19

14. Cecil Rhodes (1853 – 1902)

Role: The Imperial Visionary

Action: A British businessman, Freemason, and diamond magnate in South Africa. He dedicated his vast wealth to the goal of expanding British rule worldwide. His will funded the Rhodes Scholarships to cultivate a leadership class loyal to this vision and laid the groundwork for the secret society that would become the Round Table groups.

15. Lord Alfred Milner (1854 – 1925)

Role: The Organizer

Action: A British statesman and key executor of Cecil Rhodes's will. He was the primary organizer and leader of the Round Table groups, a semi-secret network of elites across the British Empire dedicated to preserving and expanding imperial influence.

16. Lord Nathaniel Rothschild (1840 – 1915)

Role: The Financier

Action: Head of the English branch of the Rothschild banking dynasty. He was the primary financier of the Round Table groups, providing the crucial capital needed to fund their activities and publications.

17. Arthur Balfour (1848 – 1930)

Role: The Statesman

Action: British Prime Minister and Freemason. As Foreign Secretary in 1917, he issued the Balfour Declaration, a formal statement of the British government's support for a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, a major victory for the Zionist coalition.

18. Colonel Edward M. House (1858 – 1938)

Role: The American Connector

Action A powerful behind-the-scenes advisor to U.S. President Woodrow Wilson. A key Round Table member in America, he was instrumental in founding the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in 1921 as the American vehicle for the Round Table's globalist vision.

19. John D. Rockefeller Jr. (1874 – 1960)

Role: The American Patron

Action: The son of Standard Oil's founder and a major philanthropist. He was a primary financial backer ("angel") of the Council on Foreign Relations in its early days, providing the funds needed to establish its influence.

20. Henry Kissinger (1923 – 2023)

Role: The Archetypal Insider

Action: A German-born American diplomat, CFR member, and prolific author. As National Security Advisor and Secretary of State, he became the ultimate embodiment of the CFR statesman—a scholar-practitioner wielding immense influence over U.S. foreign policy based on the organization's realist, elite-driven worldview.

21. David M. Rubenstein (b. 1949)

Role: The Modern Chairman**

Action: A co-founder of the Carlyle Group private equity firm. He has been the Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations since 2017, representing the continuation of the organization's power and influence into the 21st century, steering its role in shaping global policy and discourse.

3) The Rise of Key Decision-Makers and the Forces That Shaped Our Present (The Story ):

The Theological Fault Line: Our story begins with a theological earthquake that cracked the foundation of Western Christendom. It was set off by a German monk, Martin Luther.

The Lightning Strike: Luther's Rebellion

In 1505, a terrified young law student named Martin Luther, caught in a violent thunderstorm, vowed to become a monk if he survived. He kept his vow and entered the Augustinian monastery. There, he was tormented by a single, burning question: "How can a sinful man be right before a holy God?"

The Augustinian order provided a crucial piece of the answer: salvation comes solely from God’s grace, not from human effort or good works. Luther clung to this idea, developing it into the doctrine of Sola Fide—justification by faith alone. This was a direct challenge to the Catholic Church's system of sacraments, priesthood, and the sale of "indulgences" (payments to reduce punishment for sins).

In 1517, Luther famously nailed his 95 Theses to the church door in Wittenberg, challenging the practice of indulgences. Thanks to the new printing press, his ideas spread uncontrollably. Printers, eager to profit, often edited his pamphlets to be even more inflammatory.

Luther’s rebellion crystallized into core principles that shattered the Church’s authority:

Sola Scriptura: The Bible, not the Pope or Church tradition, is the ultimate authority for Christians.

The Priesthood of All Believers: Every Christian has direct access to God; no human mediator is needed.

Protected by German princes who saw a chance to seize power and wealth from Rome, Luther translated the Bible into German, putting it directly into the hands of the people. This movement, Lutheranism, was formally established across parts of Germany and Europe after the Peace of Augsburg (1555), which allowed each ruler to choose the religion of their state i.e Lutheranism(Protestant) or Catholicism. This political solution to a religious problem did not create peace but merely set the stage for the devastating Thirty Years' War (1618-1648), a catastrophic conflict between Catholic and Protestant states.

A New Way of Reading: The "Missing" Israel

This new Protestant way of reading the Bible had a profound and unexpected consequence. For over a thousand years, the Catholic Church's official narrative was that it was the "new Israel"—the spiritual successor to God's promises in the Bible. The physical land and people of Israel were seen as irrelevant.

But now, Protestants were reading the Bible for themselves. As they poured over the Old Testament, they saw a different story. They read explicit, unfulfilled prophecies about God's promises to the Jewish people and a future return to the physical land of Israel. A puzzle emerged: if the Church is Israel, why do these prophecies speak of a physical return to Zion?

Their Israel was "missing." This led to the birth of Christian Zionism—the belief that the return of the Jewish people to the Holy Land was a necessary precursor to the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Supporting this return became, for many, a sacred duty.

The Philosophical Counter-Revolution: Reason vs. Revelation

While Protestants were championing the Bible, a powerful intellectual movement was rising that would challenge the very foundation of all faith: The Enlightenment.

Thinkers began to elevate human reason to the supreme judge of all truth, including religious truth. This created a crisis for faith:

René Descartes (1596-1650) attempted to prove God's existence through logic and reason. In doing so, he inadvertently made faith dependent on rational justification.

David Hume (1711-1776) argued that all human knowledge comes only from sensory experience. He aggressively challenged the possibility of knowing anything about God through reason or experience, pushing philosophy towards radical skepticism.

Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) tried to save morality by arguing that God, freedom, and immortality are necessary "postulates of practical reason"—not things we can know, but things we must believe in to be moral. The Bible, in this view, was not divine revelation but a useful book of moral teachings.

To many devout Protestants, this "Moral Religion" of Enlightenment liberalism was a hollow, human-made substitute for the powerful, revealed God of the Bible. It seemed to leave no room for prophecy, miracle, or divine plan.

The Dispensationalist Answer: A Blueprint for History

The response to this crisis came from an unexpected place. In the 1830s, a group of earnest Bible students in Dublin, known as the Plymouth Brethren, began a intense study of scripture. If the arguments of the philosophers were correct and human reason was flawed, than the only place to find truth was the word of God i.e Bible. The Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815) and the subsequent political upheaval in Europe were seen not as random events, but as the divine shaking of nations that would precede the end of the 1,260 years of papal supremacy. (The calculation suggested that the full end of this prophetic period and the dawn of a new age would occur around 1866-1867.When Christ did not return visibly in 1867, it led to what is called "The Great Disappointment" and caused a major schism in prophetic interpretation. Some abandoned date-setting, while others (like the Brethren) refined their views into the doctrine of an any-moment, imminent Rapture that could occur before the tribulation period, thus making specific date-setting unnecessary. their leading thinker, John Nelson Darby (1800-1882), systemized a new theological framework called Dispensationalism.

This framework was brilliantly explained to the masses via the Scofield Reference Bible (1909), edited by Cyrus I. Scofield (1843–1921). It offered a compelling way to resolve the "missing Israel" problem and defend the Bible against Enlightenment skepticism.

Dispensationalism taught that God has two distinct peoples with two distinct plans:

Israel (Earthly): God's earthly chosen people, with promises related to a physical nation and land. Their story is one of prophecy and literal fulfillment.

The Church (Heavenly): A spiritual body of believers from all nations, with promises that are heavenly and spiritual.

This "parenthesis theory" held that the Church age was a temporary interruption in God's primary plan for Israel. According to this view, the Church ( the collective body of jews and Gentiles that believe in christianity or christ ) would be raptured (suddenly taken to heaven) before a period of great tribulation on earth. During this tribulation, God's focus would return to Israel, culminating in the Battle of Armageddon and the physical return of Christ to reign in Jerusalem.

This created a powerful and urgent imperative: "If you're a good Christian, you have to support Israel before the tribulation waves begin." supporting the physical state of Israel became a act of faith, a way to align oneself with God's policy and prophecy. It was not about politics; it was about eschatology—the belief that by supporting Israel, one was helping to usher in the return of Christ.

This theological innovation, born from the fires of the Reformation and sharpened against the skepticism of the Enlightenment, provided the ideological fuel for everything that followed. It created a modern, rational-looking faith that still held a secret, apocalyptic core—a perfect worldview for a new, ambitious elite.

The Prophet of Science - Isaac Newton's Divine Plan: The theological revolution sparked by Luther and systematized by Darby found its most unlikely and powerful champion not in a theologian, but in the greatest scientist of his age: Isaac Newton.

Newton: The Orphan Chosen by God

Newton’s story is key to understanding his mindset. He was an orphan raised by his grandmother. That a boy of such humble origins could rise to become the President of the Royal Society and Master of the Royal Mint was, to him and his contemporaries, not just a stroke of luck. It was a sign of God’s special favour. He saw himself as a chosen instrument, a man with a divine mission to purify Christianity from what he saw as the corruption of the Trinity and to uncover God's master plan for creation.

His life’s work was a paradox that would define the next three centuries. He is famous for his science—the laws of motion, universal gravitation, and calculus—which presented a universe operating by immutable, rational laws. This was his public face: the ultimate rationalist.

But in private, Newton was something else entirely. He was a radical heretic who rejected the doctrine of the Trinity. He was an alchemical "freak" who spent decades in his laboratory searching for the Philosopher's Stone, trying to unlock the secrets of matter. Most of all, he was a prophecy obsessive.

He believed that to understand the mind of God, one had to study two things:

Nature: Through his laws of physics, which revealed the mechanics of God's creation.

Prophecy: Through the books of Daniel and Revelation, which revealed God's plan for history.

He produced a massive work, "Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John," in which he meticulously calculated dates for the end of the world. Crucially, like the later Dispensationalists, Newton became convinced that the Jews must return to Israel as a necessary precondition for Christ's return. His scientific genius was now harnessed to a divine, apocalyptic timeline.

The Royal Society: Science with a Secret Mission

Newton’s influence was magnified through his leadership of the Royal Society (President from 1703-1727). Founded in 1660, it's members included Aristocrats & Nobility Earl of Pembroke, Prince George Political protection & prestige

Finance & Trade Magnates Montagu, Child Empire funding, East India ties

Naval & Military Planners Pepys, Wren Navigation, mapping, shipbuilding

Theologians & Clergy Boyle, Wilkins, Newton (prophecy) Religious legitimation of empire

Scientists / Engineers Halley, Hooke, Hauksbee Technological and cartographic power the Society was the world's premier scientific institution. But like its president, it had a dual purpose:

Public Image: A club for rational gentlemen dedicated to scientific progress, experimentation, and national improvement.

Hidden Goal: A hub for Newton's ideological followers—Christian Zionists who believed in prophecy and a divine mission for the British Empire. Key Works

Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John (written c. 1690s–1700s, published posthumously 1733)

This is his most famous theological text.

Newton reads the Bible like a mathematician — decoding history through prophecy.

Main ideas:

Human history follows a divinely structured timeline revealed in Daniel and Revelation.

The “Beast” and “Antichrist” are corrupt religious powers, especially Rome and the Papacy.

He identifies successive world empires — Babylonian, Persian, Greek, Roman — culminating in modern Europe.

He predicts a future restoration of the Jews to their homeland, before the millennium (a 1,000-year reign of Christ).

> “The Jews will return from captivity and rebuild the waste places, and see the glory of the Lord.”

He insists prophecy isn’t for predicting dates but for recognizing God’s plan unfolding through nations.

The Society gave intellectual justification for empire-building. The mission was clear: Science was progress, and the British Empire was a civilizing force chosen by God to advance His plan. This plan culminated in preparing the world for Christ's return, which required, among other things, the restoration of the Jews to Palestine.

The Masonic Bridge: Order, Reason, and Brotherhood

At the exact same time Newton was leading the Royal Society, another organization was formalizing itself in London: Modern Freemasonry, with the founding of its first Grand Lodge in 1717.

The connection is direct. Newton’s protégé and successor, John Theophilus Desaguliers, was the driving intellectual and organizational force behind the Grand Lodge. He co-authored the Masonic constitution and sought to apply Newton's sense of rational order and cosmic structure to a social organization.

The Masonic lodges became the "social army of the Enlightenment." They were hubs of debate where the ideas of philosophers like Descartes, Hume, and Kant were discussed. They promoted a "religion of reason and morality" that made specific divine revelation seem unnecessary to some. Their core principles were:

A belief in a "Grand Architect of the Universe" based on logic, not scripture.

The idea that God does not interfere in the world (Deism), aligning with Newton's clockwork universe.

Fraternity, equality, and self-governance.

This provided the perfect operational toolkit. The lodges were networks of influential men who practiced democracy in their meetings and were bound by secrecy and loyalty. They were ready-made cells for revolutionary activity. It is no coincidence that key American revolutionaries—George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Paul Revere—were Freemasons. The ideals and organizational structure they practiced in the lodge were directly applied to the revolution against Britain.

The Network Consolidates: From Newton to Rhodes

After Newton's death, this fusion of scientific rationalism, prophetic belief, and elite networking did not die. It became embedded in the British ruling class.

Missionary movements, infused with this Newtonian-Dispensationalist belief, swept across the British Empire into Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. They didn't just spread the gospel; they taught that Britain had a divine destiny to restore the Jews to Palestine.

Powerful figures like Lord Shaftesbury (1801-1885), a Newtonian influencer, lobbied relentlessly for a Jewish homeland. By the 19th century, this was no longer a fringe belief. It was an elite obsession.

The coalition that would eventually make it happen was forming:

Newtonian Intellectuals providing the theological and "scientific" justification.

Evangelical Christians providing the popular fervor.

Banking Dynasties (like the Rothschilds) providing the financing and political influence.

Free Masons providing the networked organizational structure.

This powerful alliance would soon set its sights on a concrete political goal, and they would find their ultimate instrument in a diamond magnate obsessed with global domination.

The Round Table - Engineering a Global Order The ideological framework was now firmly in place. A coalition of Newtonian intellectuals, evangelical Zionists, financial power, and Masonic networks believed in a divine plan that required British global hegemony and the restoration of the Jews. The next step was to organize this belief into a permanent, structured force for shaping world events. This required a visionary—and a very wealthy—organizer.

Cecil Rhodes: The Imperial Visionary

That man was Cecil Rhodes (1853–1902). A Freemason who made a vast fortune from diamond mining in South Africa (founding De Beers), Rhodes was a man possessed by a grand, almost mystical vision. He was obsessed with the idea of a British-led world order, a modern-day Roman Empire that would bring peace, stability, and (in his view) progress to the globe.

In 1877, while still a young man at Oxford, Rhodes wrote a will outlining his plan. He called for the formation of a "secret society" dedicated to a single goal: "the extension of British rule throughout the world." His motivation was not just jingoistic patriotism; it was deeply influenced by the Newtonian-prophetic worldview. He believed the Anglo-Saxon race was uniquely destined to civilize the world and prepare it for a higher purpose.

The Round Table Groups: Rhodes's Legacy

After Rhodes's death, his massive fortune was used to pursue this vision. His close ally and executor, Lord Alfred Milner, became the key organizer. Instead of a single secret society, Milner established a network of semi-secret elite circles across the British Empire: in Britain, South Africa, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. These were the Round Table Groups.

Their membership was a who's who of the Anglo-Saxon elite:

Lord Nathaniel Rothschild provided the financial backing.

Arthur Balfour (British Prime Minister and Freemason, Lodge No. 1541, London) provided high-level political influence.

A cadre of young administrators (Milner's "Kindergarten") were trained in this worldview and placed in strategic positions across the empire.

The Round Table's mission was explicit: to preserve and expand the British Empire. They operated on the same principle of concentric circles of secrecy as the Masons: an outer circle of general members and a powerful, directive inner circle. Their tool for spreading influence was the Rhodes Scholarship, designed to bring young men from the colonies and America to Oxford to be indoctrinated into this imperial worldview.

The American Pivot: The Council on Foreign Relations

World War I was a catastrophe for British power. The Round Table groups realized Britain could no longer sustain global dominance alone. The baton had to be passed to a new, rising Anglo-Saxon power: the United States.

Round Table members in the U.S., such as Colonel Edward Mandell House (President Woodrow Wilson's closest advisor), pushed for an American branch. In 1921, they founded the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

The CFR was the Round Table's successor. It adopted the same model but with a new, modern face:

Public Image: An independent, non-partisan, evidence-based think tank for foreign policy elites. It presented itself as rational, scientific, and pragmatic—the very image of Newtonian objectivity.

Hidden Goals: To maintain a US-led global order and advance the long-term ideological projects of its members, which included the Zionist cause. Just as the Royal Society had given intellectual justification for the British Empire, the CFR provided the intellectual justification for the American Empire.

Its membership was, and is, a roll call of American power:

John D. Rockefeller Jr. (son of the Standard Oil founder) was an early financial angel.

Henry Kissinger (CFR member) became the ultimate embodiment of the CFR statesman as National Security Advisor and Secretary of State.

David M. Rubenstein is the current (2024) Chairman.

Like the Masons and the Round Table, the CFR is built on elite selection, secrecy, and a hierarchy of influence. Careers in government, finance, and academia are built on CFR connections. It is the ultimate "old boys' network," where a shared worldview is reinforced and translated into policy.

The Fulfillment: From Balfour to Statehood

This decades-long project of elite networking and ideological cultivation finally achieved its most concrete goal in 1917. The Balfour Declaration, a letter from British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour, 1st Earl of Balfour, was a Freemason. He was initiated into the Stracholan Lodge, No. 1359 to Lord Rothschild, declared the British government's support for "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people."

This was not an act of sudden generosity. It was the culmination of pressure from the very coalition we have traced:

Newtonian/Evangelical Zionists in Britain provided the theological and popular pressure.

The Round Table network, with its members in high government offices, provided the political will.

The Rothschilds and other financial interests provided the clout.

The CFR later picked up this torch, ensuring that after World War II, American policy would continue to support the creation and sustenance of the State of Israel. For the believers in this network, this was not merely geopolitics; it was prophecy being fulfilled through policy. They were, in their minds, acting as God's instruments, using the tools of science, empire, and statecraft to pave the way for a divine culmination of history.

The Modern Legacy - A World Built on a Blueprint The threads we have followed—theological rebellion, prophetic science, elite networks, and imperial ambition—did not remain in the early 20th century. They wove themselves into the very fabric of the modern world order, influencing everything from foreign policy to popular culture.

The Unseen Architecture of Power

The model established by the Round Table and the CFR became the blueprint for 20th and 21st-century governance: government by think tank and policy paper. Major decisions are rarely made in public view first. They are developed, debated, and consensus-built within semi-closed networks of elites from government, finance, academia, and media—many of whom are members of organizations like the CFR, the Bilderberg Group, or the Trilateral Commission.

These groups, direct descendants of the Round Table, share its core characteristics:

Elite Selection: Membership is by invitation only, creating a self-perpetuating class of influential individuals.

A Global Vision: They operate on a transnational level, often prioritizing a "global order" over national interests.

Secrecy and Hierarchy: Meetings are held under Chatham House Rule, protecting participants while allowing ideas to be disseminated. Real direction comes from an inner core, not the general membership.

Philanthropy as a Tool: Giant foundations (Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie) fund projects that advance this worldview, from university programs to NGO initiatives, shaping society from the ground up.

The Unshakeable Support for Israel

The most persistent and visible outcome of this historical chain is the unwavering support for the State of Israel by the United States and other Western powers. For the general public, this is often explained through straightforward geopolitics: a democratic ally in a volatile region.

But as our story shows, the deeper roots are ideological and theological. The Dispensationalist belief that supporting Israel is a biblical imperative has massive popular appeal, especially in American evangelical circles. This popular sentiment is amplified and guided by an elite stratum that has been steeped in the same worldview for centuries, albeit often in a more secularized, "strategic" form.

A small evidence : 

https://youtube.com/shorts/cYjGgRIGnRw?si=rPN7h0izxsButxS3

Politicians, diplomats, and policymakers who emerge from these networks are often operating on a foundation laid by Newton, Darby, and Rhodes. The policy goal aligns with the prophetic goal: ensure the security and prosperity of the Jewish state as a key pillar of the world order. This creates a powerful feedback loop where religious belief, strategic interest, and elite consensus reinforce each other, making the policy incredibly resilient to change.

The Enduring Tension: Reason vs. Revelation

The world we live in today is the world Isaac Newton helped create: a world that operates on science, reason, and natural law. Yet, as we have seen, Newton himself believed this rational universe was governed by a God with a prophetic plan.

This tension is still with us. Our modern elites—the politicians, bankers, and tech moguls—present themselves as rational actors in a secular world. Yet, the underlying frameworks that guide their grand strategies often contain the echoes of unspoken, quasi-religious beliefs about destiny, a civilizing mission, and a teleological (goal-oriented) view of history.

The "End of History" narrative, the belief in the inevitable global triumph of liberal democracy, is a secularized version of a divine plan. The mission to "spread democracy" can be seen as a modern incarnation of the "civilizing mission" of the British Empire.

Conclusion: The Unfolding Quest

So, what began with a monk seeking grace in a thunderstorm evolved into a world-shaping force. The journey is a testament to how ideas, once unleashed, can take on a life of their own:

Luther’s Sola Scriptura empowered individuals to read the Bible for themselves, leading them to discover "missing" prophecy.

Newton’s Genius provided a rational, scientific universe that could still accommodate this prophecy, making it respectable for elites.

Darby’s Dispensationalism created a tidy theological system that explained history's arc and made support for Israel a Christian duty.

Rhodes’s Wealth and Vision funded and organized a network dedicated to turning this belief into a geopolitical reality.

The Round Table and CFR institutionalized this network, creating a permanent engine for influencing policy on both sides of the Atlantic.

The "Quest for World Dominance" is, therefore, not a simple conspiracy. It is far more powerful and complex: it is a convergence of ideology, theology, finance, and statecraft that has spanned centuries. Its adherents believe they are not acting for personal gain, but as agents of a higher purpose—whether that purpose is called God’s Plan, the Divine Mission of the Anglo-Saxon Race, or the Liberal International Order.

They have built our world according to a blueprint they believe is both rational and prophetic. And the story continues to unfold, as each generation inherits this blueprint and works, in its own way, to see it fulfilled. 

The Christian Zionist End-Times Plan: A Step-by-Step Timeline This plan is derived from a literal interpretation of books like Ezekiel, Daniel, Revelation, and Paul's letters.

Step 1: The Rebirth of Israel (Fulfilled) Action: The Jewish people must return to their ancestral homeland and re-establish the state of Israel.

Significance: This is seen as the indispensable starting gun for the end-times clock. The prophecy in Ezekiel 36-37 (the "Valley of Dry Bones") is viewed as a literal promise of national restoration. The founding of Israel in 1948 is not just a political event but the primary sign that the end times are underway.

Step 2: The Global Coalition Against Israel Action: A specific coalition of nations, often identified from Ezekiel 38-39 (Gog and Magog), will launch a massive invasion against Israel. This coalition typically includes Russia, Iran, Turkey, and others.

Significance: This attack will be supernaturally thwarted by God Himself, demonstrating His protection over Israel and setting the stage for the next phase. This victory is believed to give Israel a false sense of security, leading to a peace deal.

Step 3: The Rapture of the Church Action: At any moment (a doctrine known as the Imminent Rapture), Jesus Christ will secretly return in the clouds. All true believers who have died will be resurrected, and living believers will be "caught up" to meet Him in the air, vanishing from the earth.

Significance: This event removes the Church (the body of believers in Jesus) from the earth before a period of God's wrath. The earth is left in chaos with millions missing.

Step 4: The Rise of the Antichrist and the Tribulation Action: In the power vacuum after the Rapture, a charismatic global leader (the Antichrist) emerges from a revived Roman Empire (often interpreted as a European-led coalition). He brokers a 7-year peace treaty with Israel (Daniel 9:27), guaranteeing its security.

The Temple Rebuilt: This peace deal allows Jews to rebuild their Third Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. This necessitates the removal or destruction of the Islamic holy sites, the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque.

The Abomination of Desolation: Halfway through the 7 years (after 3.5 years), the Antichrist breaks the treaty, enters the newly built Jewish Temple, declares himself to be God, and demands worldwide worship (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4). This event kicks off the Great Tribulation—a period of 3.5 years of unprecedented war, famine, natural disasters, and divine judgment.

Step 5: The Battle of Armageddon and Christ's Return Action: The world's armies, led by the Antichrist, gather in Israel to fight what they believe is their final battle at Armageddon (the plains of Megiddo). At the moment of Israel's certain defeat, Jesus Christ returns physically and visibly to the Mount of Olives with the armies of heaven.

Significance: Jesus destroys the opposing armies, defeats the Antichrist, and casts him into hell. This concludes the 7-year Tribulation period.

Step 6: The Millennial Kingdom Action: Jesus Christ establishes His literal, physical kingdom on earth from Jerusalem, ruling for 1,000 years of perfect peace and righteousness (Revelation 20:4).

Significance: During this time, Satan is bound and imprisoned. Jesus fulfills the Old Testament promises made to Israel, ruling as the Davidic Messiah with glorified believers and a restored nation of Israel at the center of world governance.

The Driving Motivation for Christian Zionism This timeline is the absolute core of why many Christian Zionists are so passionately devoted to supporting the modern state of Israel, regardless of the political complexities.

They believe that by supporting Israeli control of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount, they are actively helping to fulfill prophecy and set the stage for Steps 4, 5, and 6.

They see any conflict involving Israel (especially with the nations named in Ezekiel) as a confirmation that Step 2 is approaching.

Their support is ultimately not about Jewish self-determination but about the belief that a Jewish-controlled Temple Mount is a necessary prerequisite for the return of Jesus Christ.

The Religious Jewish (Messianic) Perspective: A Theological Plan This view is held by religious Zionists and Orthodox Jews who believe the state has theological significance. It is based on teachings in the Torah, Prophets (Nevi'im), and Talmud.

The Core Plan:

The Current State (Exile): The Jewish people are still in a state of exile (Galut), not just physically from the land, but spiritually from God's full presence, which is manifested in the Temple.

The Process of Redemption (Atchalta De'Geulah): The re-establishment of Israel is not the final redemption itself, but the "beginning of the dawn of redemption." It is seen as the first, divinely-assisted step in a process.

The Ingathering of the Exiles (Kibbutz Galuyot): All Jews from around the world will return to the Land of Israel. This is happening now through immigration.

The Rebuilding of the Temple (Binyan Beit HaMikdash): The Third Temple must be rebuilt on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. This is the central, ultimate goal that will restore proper worship and God's presence on Earth.

The Coming of the Messiah (Mashiach): A human, mortal descendant of King David will arise as the Messiah. He will be a supremely righteous political and spiritual leader who:

Completes the ingathering of the exiles.

Rebuilds the Temple in Jerusalem.

Restores the religious courts of law and the Davidic dynasty.

Leads the entire world to knowledge of the God of Israel, ending war and establishing an era of universal peace and perfection (Isaiah 2:4).

The Resurrection of the Dead (Techiyat HaMeitim): The righteous dead will be resurrected to enjoy the perfected world.

The Olam HaBa (The World to Come): This is the final, eternal state of perfection and divine bliss for the world.

Conclusion: A Convergence of Interests Leading to Calculated Brutality

The historical trajectory from Luther's sola scriptura to the halls of the CFR reveals a powerful and disturbing convergence: a modern elite, operating under the guise of rational policy, is effectively executing a theological end-game. The Council on Foreign Relations, as the successor to Rhodes' and Milner's imperial projects, is not merely a think tank; it is the operational command center for a worldview where American hegemony is the modern vehicle for a deeply embedded, centuries-old prophetic agenda. Its bipartisan roster of leaders—from Kissinger to Blinken, and from Rubin to Rubenstein—ensures the uninterrupted enforcement of a single, relentless policy: the unconditional support for the expansion and consolidation of a Jewish state in Biblical Israel.

The paradox of powerful elites fueling antisemitism begins to make sense within this framework. The brutality we see today — and the rise of open antisemitism around the world — is not a mistake or a lapse in judgment, but part of a deliberate strategy. Slower, quieter methods of removing a people — through occupation, forced migration, or even policies that quietly reduce birth rates — would not match the urgency of the apocalyptic timetable these architects believe they are following. Nor increase the divide between Jew and Gentile. Their plan demands speed. By allowing a visible, undeniable genocide to unfold and by ensuring the world sees it in real time, they achieve two goals at once:

1. It terrorizes the Palestinian population into a mass exodus, achieving the territorial goal of a Judeo-centric Eretz Israel.

2. It inflames global antisemitism to a fever pitch, creating an existential threat for Jews in the Diaspora. This manufactured danger is designed to shatter their sense of security in nations worldwide, making immigration to Israel not a choice of faith or nationalism, but the only perceived option for survival.

Thus, the CFR-led Western establishment and the messianic factions of Zionism are in a temporary, tactical alliance. They are united not by a shared final vision, but by a shared immediate objective: to use any means necessary to fulfill the "Ingathering of the Exiles" by making the world untenable for Jews outside of Israel. They are actively, and violently, trying to force the hand of history—and, they believe, the hand of God—to trigger a chain of events they have been planning for centuries, culminating in a final, redemptive conflict. The humanitarian catastrophe is, to them, not a regrettable byproduct but a necessary catalyst in a divine script they are hell-bent on manufacturing.

The Jewish Perspective can be understood through these small videos: 

https://youtube.com/shorts/fjGcOVMG8_4?si=KZ7f0uXheHRDST8A

https://youtube.com/shorts/43kS0iVnARU?si=hgo6bj2rI7Fjosv2

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNgF2u5uzDk/?igsh=MWE5Nmg0cWVrdWhyaQ==

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNHZUHLNaHz/?igsh=MmF4d3puZjJkb2lp

Under This I am Sharing my own Hand written notes which can be consulted for a better overall understanding!

                                        A Short Summary 

For over a thousand years, people have fought over a single question: who gets to define truth?

Back in the 4th century, Augustine of Hippo taught that salvation came only through God’s grace, not human effort. His ideas set the stage for centuries of debate. Then, in the 14th and 15th centuries, men like John Wycliffe in England and Jan Huss in Bohemia rose up against the Catholic Church, saying scripture — not the Pope — was the ultimate authority. Huss was burned at the stake for his beliefs, but his martyrdom lit a fuse that would burn for generations.

In the early 1500s, Erasmus published a Greek New Testament that gave reformers fresh ammunition. One of them was Martin Luther, an Augustinian monk who struggled deeply with guilt and the search for God’s mercy. In 1517, Luther nailed his 95 Theses to a church door, denouncing the sale of indulgences and challenging the Pope’s authority. His message boiled down to three radical claims: only the Bible had ultimate authority (sola scriptura), only faith saved (sola fide), and every believer could approach God directly.

The printing press turned Luther into a sensation. His writings spread like wildfire, especially in Germany, where princes embraced his cause both for conviction and for political power. The Catholic Church tried to crush him, but it was too late. Europe split, and the Protestant Reformation shook the foundations of the old order.

Wars followed. The bloodiest, the Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648), ravaged Central Europe until the Treaty of Westphalia finally brought peace — not by resolving theology, but by inventing modern statecraft. Religion was no longer the sole ruler of politics; power itself became the new god.

But while armies fought on the battlefield, another force quietly shaped the future: prophecy. For centuries, the Church had taught that Christians were the “true Israel.” But Protestants reading scripture literally asked dangerous new questions: What about the Jews? Shouldn’t they return to their homeland if the Bible is true? Suddenly, prophecy and politics began to mix.

No one embodied this strange fusion more than Isaac Newton. Known today as the genius who discovered gravity, Newton spent far more time studying the Bible than science. In his secret papers, he argued that the Jews must return to Palestine for God’s plan to unfold. Even as Master of the Mint, overseeing England’s money supply, Newton saw himself as part of a divine script. For him, science, economics, and prophecy were threads of the same tapestry.

This prophetic-imperial vision only grew stronger in Britain. Freemasons obsessed with Solomon’s Temple, empire-builders dreaming of global control, and Bible literalists all merged into one current of thought: history had a destiny, and Britain was chosen to guide it.

Two centuries later, Cecil Rhodes — diamond tycoon, imperialist, and Freemason — turned that vision into a political project. He dreamed of uniting the English-speaking world under one empire. His protégé, Lord Alfred Milner, carried the mission forward, creating secret networks known as the Round Table Groups. These circles trained young elites who would go on to shape global policy for decades. e.g Milner's Kindergarten.

As Britain declined, this network crossed the Atlantic. In 1921, American financiers and statesmen — Rockefeller, Morgan, Warburg, Carnegie, alongside Wilson’s adviser Edward Mandell House — founded the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Like Newton’s Royal Society centuries before, it presented itself as rational and academic, but behind the curtain, it carried forward the same blend of theology and strategy. Members of the CFR played key roles in supporting Jewish migration to Palestine, setting the stage for the creation of Israel.

Meanwhile, a new theology spread through America: dispensationalism. Popularized by John Nelson Darby and later embedded in Cyrus Scofield’s Reference Bible, it taught that the return of Jews to Palestine was not just politics but prophecy. Millions of American Christians began to see support for Israel as a divine duty. What started with Luther’s Bible study now shaped the foreign policy of the most powerful nation on Earth.

Seen in isolation, these figures look ordinary: Luther, the reformer; Newton, the scientist; Rhodes, the businessman; the CFR, just another think tank. But when you connect the dots, a continuous thread emerges: a long chain of men and movements who believed they were serving not just nations, but destiny itself.

This story — stretching from Augustine to Luther, Newton to Rhodes, Milner to the CFR — reveals how faith, empire, science, and finance all fused into a single project. It explains why Israel occupies such a central place in Western politics today, and why power is still exercised with a strange mixture of reason and prophecy.

Most people never see the pattern. But once you do, the modern world looks very different.

Most people live their entire lives without ever asking who truly runs the world or what hidden forces shape the wars, treaties, and “policies” we take for granted.

Think about it: how many people around you could explain the chain that connects Luther’s theological revolution, Newton’s prophetic obsessions, Rhodes’ imperial schemes, Milner’s secretive networks, and the modern-day Council on Foreign Relations? Almost none. Less than a fraction of one percent of humanity can even see this pattern — yet this very pattern explains why nations rise, why wars are fought, and why certain ideas dominate our age.

This ignorance isn’t accidental. The world is designed to keep you entertained, distracted, and too exhausted to ever pull at the deeper threads. Psychology calls it learned helplessness — when people start to believe they can’t understand or change the system, so they stop trying. That’s exactly the mindset the system wants you to have.

But the truth is: once you start looking, the pieces line up. And once you see them, you can’t unsee them. That awareness alone makes you freer than 99% of people who never question.

So here’s my challenge: don’t take my word for it. Research it yourself. Look into Luther, Newton, Rhodes, Milner, the Round Table, the CFR. Follow the trail. Share what you learn. Build discussions around it. The more people connect these dots, the harder it becomes for elites to operate in the shadows.

Remember: knowledge spreads like fire. But it only takes a few sparks — a few people willing to read, question, and talk — to light up a whole forest. Be one of those sparks. 

( Share This Article or print it and spread copies maybe even add to it!) Share Your Views in the comment Section!